If we were to be truly honest and characterize how our past has accurately informed our future across scientific models, what would we come up with? Does our past inform us better when nature is in control? Or when our direct human influence can alter outcomes? Collectively, can we confidently continue to depend on simulation as the spearhead of decision-making? Is there no room for prudently incorporating something that does not depend on our history to make a choice, like "revelations"?
top of page
bottom of page