The Prediction Project

The Past and Present of the Future

LogoIcon3_edited_edited_edited.png
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Spotify
  • HOME

  • ABOUT

  • MATERIALS

    • Prediction Essentials
    • Omens & Oracles
    • Rise of Theory
    • Modern Prediction
    • More to Explore
  • COURSES

  • TALKS

  • WRITINGS

    • Uncertainty about Uncertainty
    • Data Driven Dilemmas
    • Uncertain Risks
  • PRESS

  • FORUM

  • Introduction to Uncertainty

  •  

    Use tab to navigate through the menu items.
    To see this working, head to your live site.
    • Categories
    • All Posts
    • My Posts
    Oswaldo Vazquez
    Dash  ·  
    Apr 22, 2021

    Question to Brendan Meade and Susan Murphy

    in Thoughts from Learners

    Brendan Meade mentioned the following phrase: 'anywhere a physicist goes, a mathematician was there 200 years ago'. But the round table thinks that current mathematics is a bit stagnant in its applications to other sciences that have a more predictive essence/goal. ML now appears to be taking over the role of math in supporting predictions and having practical applications, I wonder if the round table thinks math and theoretical physics have gone too abstract and why?

    0 comments
    0
    0 comments

    content brought to you by

    Font-Harvard-Logo.png

    follow us

    watch us

    listen to us

    imageedit_8_5179044945.png