What do you, personally, think you will remember most about this interview a year from now? (10 points)
I believe that the most striking message from this interview is the immense responsibility that scientists and mathematicians have when communicating statistical information to the public. The discussion surrounding the difficulties inherent in using precise mathematical words like ‘denominator’ or ‘false positive rates’ can confuse more than clarify public concerns if not carefully handled. So I suppose I will remember that striking the balance between impactful yet accessible statistics is a powerful yet challenging mission.
How do you think any aspect of the interview will affect your own future, or society's future? (30 points)
Having spent my entire time at college taking math classes which have completely morphed my way of thinking and approaching problems and communicating my understanding of concepts, the importance of striking that balance between impact and accessibility has been made even more clear to me than before. So for my own future of communication, this will for sure have a lasting impact.
In terms of the societal impact, I believe that this interview will hopefully improve public decision making, in that as society becomes more literate in statistical terms and concepts aided by clearer communication, people might become more adept at making informed decisions in areas from voting to public health practices. Further, policymakers may be influenced by a shift towards more transparent statistical reporting, leading to more evidence based and publicly supported policies.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/10BUoKNP-7HYi35oI-eEY-EjPybuHfpkU/view?usp=share_link
